Deductive conclusions, like the weather, are highly sensitive to initial conditions.
Operations of thought are like cavalry charges in a battle — they are strictly limited in number, require fresh horses, and must only be made at decisive moments.
There are two kinds of philosophers: those who begin with the conclusions, and fill in with egregious reasoning; and those who begin with the reasoning, and arrive at egregious conclusions.
No one who thinks of himself as open-minded can be persuaded otherwise.
Never end up literal, but always start that way.
If it wasn’t for cognitive biases, I’d have no cognition at all.
As a competent worker will be promoted into incompetence, so a valuable method or technique will infiltrate disciplines in which it is useless or harmful.
That there is nothing new under the sun is possibly the oldest argument under the sun.
We can be sure, when we are told that all interpretation is biased, that an egregiously biased interpretation will shortly follow.
If A does X, and you ignore it, and B does X, and you condemn it, one may infer that you have more interest in A and B than in X.
Social justice is to justice what social science is to science.